JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 7, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Sala De Seguimiento·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional En Materia De Derecho A La Salud Y La Vida
  • Seguimiento al cumplimiento de las órdenes vigésima primera y vigésima segunda de la sentencia T-760/08
Seguimiento Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional En Materia De Derecho A La Salud Y A La Vida
  • Solicitar información complementaria a la requerida en el auto A.278/13, al Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

En el marco del seguimiento a las órdenes vigésima primera y vigésima segunda de la sentencia T-760/08, se solicita información complementaria a la requerida en el Auto 278 de 2013, al Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Ordenar al Ministerio de Salud y Proteccion Social que, en el termino de veinte (20) dias habiles contados a partir del recibo de la comunicacion de este auto, allegue las respuestas a los cuestionamientos formulados en el numeral 3 de la parte motiva de esta providencia, debiendo observar para tal efecto las indicaciones contenidas en la consideracion 4 de este auto.
  2. Segundo. La Secretaria General de esta Corporacion expedira la comunicacion correspondiente, adjuntando copia de este proveido.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.